You can count on me to find the "out there" articles.

In Social capital, class gender and race conflict, and population health: an essay review of Bowling Alone’s implications for social epidemiology (2002), Carles Muntaner and John Lynch, to quote their title, evaluate Bowling Alone and its implications for social epidemiology. Specifically, Muntaner and Lynch provide arguments about how Social Capital, as a framework for social epidemiology, is limited by the omission of discussion on class, race and gender relations, and political variables, and Muntaner and Lynch link earlier social science with modern social science (261).

WHY.jpeg

So....today we start off with multidirectional trolling, followed by a discussion of the Putnam reviews. I proceeded to learn that I am not allowed to use a review that was coauthored by Putnam himself, so I went to one from an Epidemiology journal instead. Fun...
After engaging in more such shenanigans, we proceeded to open a shared GDoc for the project.
IRLWork now...

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone (BECAUSE I CAN!)

Location:The Caf

Here we Go

In preparation for the Norseman Tour beginning later today, I would like to apologize for not keeping up with the posts. I've been saving post room for two mega posts coming up: The Voluntary Associations Essay and the Putnam Paper.